<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.2/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article article-type="brief-report" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>microPublication Biology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2578-9430</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Caltech Library</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17912/micropub.biology.001567</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>new finding</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>materials and reagents</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>methodology</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="subject">
          <subject>phenotype data</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="subject">
          <subject>methods</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="subject">
          <subject>ecology and evolution</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="species">
          <subject>xenopus</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>
          On X-ray Sensitivity in 
          <italic>Xenopus</italic>
           Embryogenesis
        </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Mauricio</surname>
            <given-names>Hugo</given-names>
          </name>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation">Investigation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization">Visualization</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing - original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology">Methodology</role>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Abreu</surname>
            <given-names>Jose G</given-names>
          </name>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/onceptualization">Conceptualization</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation">Data curation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation">Investigation</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology">Methodology</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration">Project administration</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision">Supervision</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing - original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft">Writing - original draft</role>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">§</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Peshkin</surname>
            <given-names>Leonid</given-names>
          </name>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/onceptualization">Conceptualization</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis">Formal analysis</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology">Methodology</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration">Project administration</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources">Resources</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision">Supervision</role>
          <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing - review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing-review-editing">Writing - review &amp; editing</role>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor2">§</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="reviewer">
          <anonymous/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1">
          <label>§</label>
          Correspondence to: Jose G Abreu (
          <email>jose.abreu.ufrj@gmail.com</email>
          )
        </corresp>
        <corresp id="cor2">
          <label>§</label>
          Correspondence to: Leonid Peshkin (
          <email>pesha@hms.harvard.edu</email>
          )
        </corresp>
        <fn fn-type="coi-statement">
          <p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>8</day>
        <month>4</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2025</volume>
      <elocation-id>10.17912/micropub.biology.001567</elocation-id>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>6</day>
          <month>3</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>5</day>
          <month>4</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>6</day>
          <month>4</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 by the authors</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>
          We examined the effects of X-ray irradiation on 
          <italic>Xenopus</italic>
          <italic>laevis</italic>
          , focusing on pre- and post-fertilization exposure. We applied X-ray doses of 10, 50, 100, 250, and 500 Gy. Fifty percent of the 360 eggs irradiated at 250 Gy failed to fertilize, while fertilized eggs developed normally until the gastrula stage. Doses ranging from 10 to 250 Gy caused developmental anomalies. High mortality rates were observed at doses of 100 to 500 Gy. Post-fertilization irradiation at 50 to 100 Gy resulted in 100% lethality, while exposure to 10 Gy led to only 13% lethality, although both exposure levels produced similar types of developmental anomalies compared to pre-fertilization irradiation. This study highlights how the timing and intensity of exposure critically affect embryo viability, especially during the sensitive stages of fertilization and gastrulation. We establish the necessary and sufficient dosage to further investigate the molecular mechanisms of X-ray damage to DNA and protein.
        </p>
      </abstract>
      <funding-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>
            <institution-wrap>
              <institution>Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (United States)</institution>
              <institution-id>https://ror.org/01jdyfj45</institution-id>
            </institution-wrap>
          </funding-source>
          <award-id>R24OD031956 </award-id>
          <principal-award-recipient>Leonid Peshkin</principal-award-recipient>
        </award-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>
            <institution-wrap>
              <institution>Amaranth</institution>
              <institution-id/>
            </institution-wrap>
          </funding-source>
          <principal-award-recipient>Leonid Peshkin</principal-award-recipient>
        </award-group>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <fig position="anchor" id="f1">
      <label>
        Figure 1. 
        <bold>
          Characterization of X-ray induced phenotypes in 
          <italic>Xenopus</italic>
           Embryogenesis
        </bold>
      </label>
      <caption>
        <p>
          <bold>
            X-Ray Impact on 
            <italic>Xenopus laevis </italic>
            development pre- and post- fertilization. 
          </bold>
          (
          <bold>A</bold>
          ) Two alternative experimental designs: irradiation pre- and post-fertilization. (
          <bold>B</bold>
          ) Bar plot of the average normal development of eggs irradiated with 10, 100, 250, and 500 Gy pre-fertilization. P values: t-test, n=3, with 120 eggs per condition in triplicates from 3 different females (total 360 per condition). Conditions significantly decreased compared to control (*: two-tailed paired t-test P &lt; 0.05). (
          <bold>C</bold>
          ) Sample embryos illustrate the phenotype classes observed during X-ray exposure: normal, exogastrulation, non-gastrulation, and death. (
          <bold>D</bold>
          ) Distribution of phenotypes observed in C for different pre-fertilization X-ray exposures. P values: t-test, n=3, with 120 eggs per condition in triplicates from 3 different females (total 360 per condition). Conditions significantly decreased compared to control (*: two-tailed paired t-test P &lt; 0.05; **: t-test P &lt; 0.001). Subfigures B and D show quantification from two independent experiments. (
          <bold>E</bold>
          ) Average survival of late neurula embryos from pre- and post-fertilized irradiated groups at 10, 50, and 100 Gy. Each group started with 50 initial eggs or zygotes in triplicates per condition of two independent females (300 embryos per condition tested). P values: t-test, n=2 of 150 embryos per condition. Conditions significantly decreased compared to control (*: two-tailed paired t-test P &lt; 0.05; **: t-test P &lt; 0.001).
        </p>
      </caption>
      <graphic xlink:href="25789430-2025-micropub.biology.001567"/>
    </fig>
    <sec>
      <title>Description</title>
      <p>X-rays primarily interact with human and animal cells through the ionizing radiation they emit, which can lead to various effects depending on the dose and duration of exposure. High ionization levels can remove tightly bound electrons from atoms, creating ions. This process can result in DNA breakage, impair the cellular repair mechanisms, and ultimately cause cell death (Saini and Gurung, 2025; Huang and Zhou, 2021). In addition to DNA damage, X-rays can directly or indirectly affect proteins, which are critical for cellular structure and function. Ionizing radiation induces protein damage through direct ionization and ROS-mediated oxidation (e.g., hydroxyl radicals), leading to carbonylation, fragmentation, and cross-linking of amino acid side chains (Hall &amp; Giaccia, 2018; Dalle-Donne et al., 2006). This disrupts enzymatic activity, signal transduction pathways, and structural integrity, exacerbating cellular dysfunction. Accumulated damage overwhelms proteostasis systems (e.g., ubiquitin-proteasome, chaperones), triggering ER stress, misfolded aggregates, and apoptosis (Malhotra &amp; Kaufman, 2007). Carbonylated proteins serve as oxidative stress biomarkers linked to neurodegeneration, aging, and radiation-associated pathologies (Stadtman &amp; Levine, 2003; Azzam et al., 2012). Gametes and zygotes are particularly radiosensitive compared to somatic cells due to radiation-induced DNA damage, interference with the cell cycle, and differentiation during these phases. This presents a convenient model to induce and study protein damage and aggregation in a controlled way.</p>
      <p>
        Amphibians, including 
        <italic>Xenopus laevis</italic>
        , have been utilized as models to study the effects of a wide range of radiation doses during embryonic development, pre-metamorphosis, and adult stages (Hamilton, 1967; Ijiri, 1979; Landreth and Dunaway, 1974; Anderson et al., 1997; Dong et al., 2010; Stark et al., 2015; Carotenuto et al., 2016). These studies generally indicated lethal doses at various stages of the amphibian life cycle. Research by Hamilton in the late 1960s demonstrated that haploid 
        <italic>Xenopus</italic>
         embryos are more sensitive to X-ray exposure than their diploid counterparts (Hamilton, 1967). Hamilton attributed this difference in X-ray dose response to genetic factors related to chromosome number. However, his study raises the possibility that DNA damage alone may not fully account for the observed results, suggesting that protein damage could also play a significant role.
      </p>
      <p>
        While these studies have highlighted how amphibians respond to radiation, further investigation is needed to understand their resistance to extreme doses. We decided to investigate the effects of pre- and post-fertilization radiation on the survival and embryonic development of 
        <italic>Xenopus laevis</italic>
        . We applied various X-ray doses: 10, 100, 250, and 500 Gy, to the 
        <italic>Xenopus</italic>
         eggs, and then fertilized them 1h after irradiation to observe the effects. We applied 10, 50, and 100 Gy to newly fertilized embryos (
        <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1A</xref>
        ).
      </p>
      <p>
        During the initial evaluation, we observed two key effects of radiation: a significant reduction in fertilization rates, particularly at the highest doses of 250 and 500 Gy, where fertilization rates dropped to approximately 50% and 5% on average, respectively (
        <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1B,</xref>
         first column table). We then noticed that the fertilized eggs showed normal development up to the blastula stage. We also observed an increase in the average number of embryos that fail to gastrulate as the radiation dose increases (
        <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1B,</xref>
         second table column). From gastrula to neurula, the radiation effect was dramatic; at just 10 Gy, an average of 76% failed to reach the neurula stage, and at 500 Gy, no embryo succeeded in transitioning from gastrula to neurula (
        <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1B,</xref>
         third table column). In another independent experiment, we evaluated four phenotypic categories observed in pre-fertilized radiated and non-radiated eggs (Fig 1C and D). In non-radiated conditions, an average of 91% of embryos presented normal development (Fig 1C and D). Conversely, several anomalies were observed at radiation doses from 10 to 500 Gy, including death, exogastrulation, and non-gastrulation (Fig 1C and D). High mortality was observed mainly in the groups that received 100, 250, and 500 Gy, presenting a mortality rate of 67.5%, 79%, and 100% embryo on average, respectively (
        <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1D</xref>
        ). Only an average of 2.5-6% of the irradiated embryos managed normal development.
      </p>
      <p>For the post-fertilization experiment, we based our design on Hamilton’s study, which applied a maximum dose of 50 Gy to diploid embryos (Hamilton, 1967). Consequently, we subjected 50 zygotes per condition, in triplicate from two distinct females to radiation doses of 0, 10, 50, and 100 Gy in order to compare the average survival of radiation exposure pre-fertilization to post-fertilization. We counted the number of surviving embryos at the late neurula stage (Fig 1E). No embryos reached the neurula stage at the 50 and 100 Gy doses (Fig 1E, dark grey bars). At the 10 Gy dose, the average number of surviving neurula embryos was roughly similar but significantly lower than that of the non-irradiated embryos (Fig 1E, first three bars).</p>
      <p>This study builds on and further elucidates X-rays' effects, expanding on Hamilton's foundational work (1967). By revisiting this topic, we introduced a pre-fertilization irradiation condition and observed that egg infertility increased proportionally with higher radiation doses. In contrast, eggs exposed to lower radiation levels exhibited a higher rate of phenotypic abnormalities but lower lethality during embryonic development. Our findings align with Hamilton's (1967) observations, showing that pre- and post-fertilization irradiated embryos can survive until the blastula stage without anomalies. However, as gastrulation begins, significant anomalies emerge, often leading to embryonic death. Notably, pre-fertilization irradiation demonstrated greater damage tolerance than post-fertilization conditions. This finding strongly suggests that the new sperm content (proteins and genetic material) counteracts to some degree the egg damage caused by X-ray irradiation from 10 to 250 Gy, which is an extreme dose.</p>
      <p>
        In summary, this study developed a reliable methodology for challenging chromosomes and cellular constituents, such as proteins, through X-ray radiation in 
        <italic>Xenopus</italic>
         eggs and embryos.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>
        <bold>Animal Preparation. </bold>
        To prepare female animals for ovulation, they were primed with 100 IU of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) (Chorulon 5000 IU – Merck A002377) 72 hours before fertilization. The night preceding fertilization, each animal received a booster injection of 750 IU of hCG and was kept in individual containers at 18°C to initiate ovulation.
      </p>
      <p>
        On the day of fertilization, male testes were surgically extracted according to protocol. Green, Sherril L. The Laboratory Xenopus. 1
        <sup>st</sup>
         Edition. 2010. The extracted testes were then preserved in a 1X MMR (NaCl 1M, KCl 20 mM, MgSO4 10 mM, CaCl2 Dihydrate 20 mM, HEPES 50 mM) solution at 4°C.
      </p>
      <p>
        <bold>Egg Collection. </bold>
        Approximately 12 hours following the hCG boost, the females were transferred to containers containing a 1X High Salt Barth solution (NaCl 1.095 M, KCl 0.010 M, NaHCO3 0.024 M, MgSO4-7H2O 0.008 M, HEPES 0.100 M, Ca(NO3)2 – 4H2O 0.003 M, CaCl2-2H2O 0.004 M). After about 90 minutes, eggs were collected for either fertilization or irradiation.
      </p>
      <p>
        <bold>Fertilization Process. </bold>
        After draining the High Salt Barth solution, eggs were fertilized using macerated testes in 1X MMR. The sperm-egg mixture was homogenized for 4 minutes, followed by adding 0.1X MMR. Cortical rotation occurred within 20 minutes. A 2% cysteine solution (Millipore 1.028838.0100) was added, and embryos were agitated 5 times every 2 minutes, rinsed with 0.1X MMR, and cultured at 18°C.
      </p>
      <p>
        <bold>Irradiation Procedure. </bold>
        Irradiation was carried out using a Rad Source RS 1800 Q X-ray machine. A mandatory 3-hour cooling period between sessions is required in experiments with 500 Gy. Each irradiation session was limited to no more than 20 minutes. Doses of 100, 250, and 500 Gy were administered on shelf 2 of the instrument (9.5 cm from the source), with samples centralized to ensure optimum radiation exposure. A 10 Gy irradiation was conducted on the instrument's floor (21.5 cm from the source), adhering to the same distribution principles. All samples were irradiated in 35 mm Petri
        <bold/>
        dishes (Falcon 353001) containing 50 to 120 eggs or embryos each. Eggs irradiated before fertilization were suspended in a small amount of 1X Barth High Salt solution for preservation. Embryos were irradiated in a 0.1X MMR solution immediately after the cysteine washing step and before the first cleavage stage.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Reagents</title>
      <table-wrap>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>
                  <bold>Reagent</bold>
                </p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>
                  <bold>N° catalog</bold>
                </p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>
                  <bold>Available From</bold>
                </p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>Chorulon 5000 IU (hCG)</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>A002377</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Merck</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>cysteine</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>1.028838.0100</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Millipore</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>Falcon 35 mm Petri dishes</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>353001</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Corning</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>NaCl</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>SX0420-5</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Millipore</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>KCl</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>7300-500GM</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Millipore</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>MgSO4.7H2O</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>230391-500G</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Sigma</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>HEPES</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>H-400-1</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Goldbio</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>Ca(NO3)2.4H2O</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>A16645.36</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Thermoscientific</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>CACL2</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>C8106-1KG</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Sigma</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <p>CACL2.2H2O</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>C3881-500G</p>
              </td>
              <td>
                <p>Sigma</p>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <sec>
        <p>We are grateful to Marc Kirschner for helpful comments.</p>
      </sec>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="R1">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Anderson</surname>
              <given-names>J A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lewellyn</surname>
              <given-names>A L</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Maller</surname>
              <given-names>J L</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>1997</year>
          <month>7</month>
          <day>1</day>
          <article-title>Ionizing radiation induces apoptosis and elevates cyclin A1-Cdk2 activity before but not after the midblastula transition in Xenopus.</article-title>
          <source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          <issue>7</issue>
          <issn>1059-1524</issn>
          <fpage>1195</fpage>
          <lpage>1206</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.8.7.1195</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R2">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Azzam</surname>
              <given-names>Edouard I.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Jay-Gerin</surname>
              <given-names>Jean-Paul</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pain</surname>
              <given-names>Debkumar</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2012</year>
          <month>12</month>
          <day>1</day>
          <article-title>Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury</article-title>
          <source>Cancer Letters</source>
          <volume>327</volume>
          <issue>1-2</issue>
          <issn>0304-3835</issn>
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          <lpage>60</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.012</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R3">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Ballesteros</surname>
              <given-names>Manuel</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Fredriksson</surname>
              <given-names>Åsa</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Henriksson</surname>
              <given-names>Jaqueline</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nyström</surname>
              <given-names>Thomas</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2001</year>
          <month>9</month>
          <day>17</day>
          <article-title>Bacterial senescence: protein oxidation in non-proliferating cells is dictated by the accuracy of the ribosomes</article-title>
          <source>The EMBO Journal</source>
          <volume>20</volume>
          <issue>18</issue>
          <issn>0261-4189</issn>
          <fpage>5280</fpage>
          <lpage>5289</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/emboj/20.18.5280</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Carotenuto</surname>
              <given-names>Rosa</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tussellino</surname>
              <given-names>Margherita</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mettivier</surname>
              <given-names>Giovanni</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Russo</surname>
              <given-names>Paolo</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2016</year>
          <month>11</month>
          <day>1</day>
          <article-title>Survival fraction and phenotype alterations of Xenopus laevis embryos at 3&amp;nbsp;Gy, 150&amp;nbsp;kV X-ray irradiation</article-title>
          <source>Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</source>
          <volume>480</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <issn>0006-291X</issn>
          <fpage>580</fpage>
          <lpage>585</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.095</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R5">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Dalle-Donne</surname>
              <given-names>Isabella</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rossi</surname>
              <given-names>Ranieri</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Giustarini</surname>
              <given-names>Daniela</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Milzani</surname>
              <given-names>Aldo</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Colombo</surname>
              <given-names>Roberto</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2003</year>
          <month>3</month>
          <day>1</day>
          <article-title>Protein carbonyl groups as biomarkers of oxidative stress</article-title>
          <source>Clinica Chimica Acta</source>
          <volume>329</volume>
          <issue>1-2</issue>
          <issn>0009-8981</issn>
          <fpage>23</fpage>
          <lpage>38</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0009-8981(03)00003-2</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R6">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Dong</surname>
              <given-names>JiaJia</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mury</surname>
              <given-names>Sean P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Drahos</surname>
              <given-names>Karen E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Moscovitch</surname>
              <given-names>Marko</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Zia</surname>
              <given-names>Royce K. P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Finkielstein</surname>
              <given-names>Carla V.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2010</year>
          <month>1</month>
          <day>29</day>
          <article-title>Shorter Exposures to Harder X-Rays Trigger Early Apoptotic Events in Xenopus laevis Embryos</article-title>
          <source>PLoS ONE</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <issn>1932-6203</issn>
          <fpage>e8970</fpage>
          <lpage>e8970</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0008970</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7">
        <mixed-citation>
          Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. 2018. 
          <italic>Radiobiology for the Radiologist</italic>
           (8th ed.). Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins. 
          <italic>Mechanisms of direct/indirect radiation effects</italic>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R8">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Hamilton</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>1967</year>
          <month>2</month>
          <day>1</day>
          <article-title>A comparison of the x-ray sensitivity of haploid and diploid zygotes of Xenopus laevis.</article-title>
          <source>Radiat Res</source>
          <volume>30</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <issn>0033-7587</issn>
          <fpage>248</fpage>
          <lpage>260</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6019777</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R9">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Huang</surname>
              <given-names>Ruixue</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Zhou</surname>
              <given-names>Ping-Kun</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2021</year>
          <month>7</month>
          <day>9</day>
          <article-title>DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy</article-title>
          <source>Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <issn>2059-3635</issn>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41392-021-00648-7</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R10">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>IJIRI</surname>
              <given-names>KEN-ICHI</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>1979</year>
          <article-title>X-Ray Effect on the Development of Xenopus laevis Embryos —With Special Reference to Primordial Germ Cells</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Radiation Research</source>
          <volume>20</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <issn>0449-3060</issn>
          <fpage>133</fpage>
          <lpage>136</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1269/jrr.20.133</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R11">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Landreth</surname>
              <given-names>HF</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Dunaway</surname>
              <given-names>PB</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cosgrove</surname>
              <given-names>GE</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>1974</year>
          <month>6</month>
          <day>1</day>
          <article-title>Effects of whole-body gamma irradiation on various life stages of the toad, Bufo woodhousei fowleri.</article-title>
          <source>Radiat Res</source>
          <volume>58</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <issn>0033-7587</issn>
          <fpage>432</fpage>
          <lpage>438</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10876633</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R12">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Malhotra</surname>
              <given-names>Jyoti D.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kaufman</surname>
              <given-names>Randal J.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2007</year>
          <month>12</month>
          <day>1</day>
          <article-title>The endoplasmic reticulum and the unfolded protein response</article-title>
          <source>Seminars in Cell &amp; Developmental Biology</source>
          <volume>18</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <issn>1084-9521</issn>
          <fpage>716</fpage>
          <lpage>731</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.09.003</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R13">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Saini</surname>
              <given-names>Saurabh</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gurung</surname>
              <given-names>Prajwal</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2024</year>
          <month>10</month>
          <day>19</day>
          <article-title>A comprehensive review of sensors of radiation‐induced damage, radiation‐induced proximal events, and cell death</article-title>
          <source>Immunological Reviews</source>
          <volume>329</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <issn>0105-2896</issn>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/imr.13409</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R14">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Stadtman</surname>
              <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Levine</surname>
              <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2003</year>
          <month>7</month>
          <day>29</day>
          <article-title>Free radical-mediated oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins</article-title>
          <source>Amino Acids</source>
          <volume>25</volume>
          <issue>3-4</issue>
          <issn>0939-4451</issn>
          <fpage>207</fpage>
          <lpage>218</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00726-003-0011-2</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R15">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Stark</surname>
              <given-names>Karolina</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Scott</surname>
              <given-names>David E.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tsyusko</surname>
              <given-names>Olga</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Coughlin</surname>
              <given-names>Daniel P.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hinton</surname>
              <given-names>Thomas G.</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <year>2015</year>
          <month>4</month>
          <day>30</day>
          <article-title>Multi-Level Effects of Low Dose Rate Ionizing Radiation on Southern Toad, Anaxyrus [Bufo] terrestris</article-title>
          <source>PLOS ONE</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <issn>1932-6203</issn>
          <fpage>e0125327</fpage>
          <lpage>e0125327</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0125327</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>