{
    "componentChunkName": "component---src-templates-article-page-js",
    "path": "/journals/biology/micropub-biology-002227",
    "result": {"data":{"article":{"manuscript":{"id":"941422ef-eefc-4258-bdc8-7338c63acbf2","submissionTypes":["new finding"],"citations":[],"doi":"10.17912/micropub.biology.002227","dbReferenceId":null,"pmcId":null,"pmId":null,"proteopedia":null,"reviewPanel":null,"species":["pseudomonas"],"integrations":[],"corrections":null,"history":{"received":"2026-06-02T13:03:46.093Z","revisionReceived":"2026-07-11T12:35:49.747Z","accepted":"2026-08-09T22:40:44.868Z","published":"2026-08-12T00:40:28.739Z","indexed":"2026-08-26T00:40:28.739Z"},"versions":[{"id":"277175af-8598-4f1e-8287-0eb1d38230e2","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 6 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, ranthipeptide, and beta lactone. </p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/8238ce4860144f94f6ed7c9872d22a44.jpg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antibiotic production of isolate MMA91 against <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. C. Phylogenetic tree of isolate MMA91 from genomic condone. D. Circus genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing. </p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u> </p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78,712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods. </p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u> </p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃. Plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing. </p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u> </p><p>DNA was extracted from MM91 after growth in Tryptic Soy Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; <a href=\"https://nanopore4edu.org/\">https://nanopore4edu.org</a>). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version  2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p><p><br /></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics. Effective antibiotics are in a small supply. Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering  new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens. Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).  </p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours  at 25℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91(Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30 degrees celsius with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1C). </p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to dientify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 6 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1D). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPP, nonribosomal peptide metallophones, terpene-precursor, lanthipeptide, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Terpene-precursor interaction with microbes alters cellular respiration and causes uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes. They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Ranthipeptide kills gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine; they are a subset of RiPPs (Precord et al. 2019). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. This data confirms antibacterial results and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis. </i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"},{"reference":"<blockquote><p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>.</p></blockquote>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"20c8983c-5cc3-4467-ba3f-5aca3bd49f0d","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 6 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, ranthipeptide, and beta lactone. </p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/bab8fda2a95bfa5f34d49e393f366603.jpg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antibiotic production of isolate MMA91 (top), MMA92 (also isolated from soil sample), MMA91 and MMA92 together, and <i>Lysobacter antibioticus </i>(positive control) against <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃.  C. Phylogenetic tree of isolate MMA91 from genomic condone. D. Circus genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u> </p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78,712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods. </p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u> </p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃. Plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing. </p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u> </p><p>DNA was extracted from MM91 after growth in Tryptic Soy Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; <a href=\"https://nanopore4edu.org/\">https://nanopore4edu.org</a>). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version  2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p><p><br /></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics. Effective antibiotics are in a small supply. Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering  new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens. Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).  </p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours  at 25℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91(Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30 degrees celsius with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1C). </p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to dientify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 6 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1D). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPP, nonribosomal peptide metallophones, terpene-precursor, lanthipeptide, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Terpene-precursor interaction with microbes alters cellular respiration and causes uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes. They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Ranthipeptide kills gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine; they are a subset of RiPPs (Precord et al. 2019). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. This data confirms antibacterial results and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis. </i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<blockquote><p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>.</p></blockquote>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Evelina Basenko"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":false}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"301c67d6-b981-428f-b0c4-a3e56cf5e412","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 5 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone.&nbsp;</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/bab8fda2a95bfa5f34d49e393f366603.jpg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antibiotic production of isolate MMA91 (top), MMA92 (also isolated from soil sample), MMA91 and MMA92 together, and <i>Lysobacter antibioticus </i>(positive control) against <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃.  C. Phylogenetic tree of isolate MMA91 from genomic condone. D. Circus genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u>&nbsp;</p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78.712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u>&nbsp;</p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃. Plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u>&nbsp;</p><p>DNA was extracted from MMA91 after growth in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; <a href=\"https://nanopore4edu.org/\">https://nanopore4edu.org</a>). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version&nbsp; 2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics. Effective antibiotics are in a small supply. Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering&nbsp; new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens. Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours&nbsp; at 25℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91(Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30 degrees celsius with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1C).&nbsp;</p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to identify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 5 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1D). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPPs, non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). MMA91 also produced ranthipeptides which are a subset of RiPPs that kill gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine (Precord et al. 2019).  Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Some terpene-precursors have been shown to alter microbial cellular respiration and cause uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes (Huang et al. 2022). They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. This data confirms antibacterial results and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis.</i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<blockquote><p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>.</p></blockquote>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"4ecf7944-8391-45b4-887c-bd7e0da3cfdc","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 5 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone.&nbsp;</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/0056f3acb2aef3a987230cf06377b619.jpeg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antimicrobial clearing of <i>Pseudomonas putida by</i> isolate MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. C. Phylogenetic tree depicts isolate MMA91 grouping closely with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>. D. Circus genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u>&nbsp;</p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78.712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u>&nbsp;</p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃. Plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u>&nbsp;</p><p>DNA was extracted from MMA91 after growth in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; <a href=\"https://nanopore4edu.org/\">https://nanopore4edu.org</a>). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version&nbsp; 2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics. Effective antibiotics are in a small supply. Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering&nbsp; new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens. Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours&nbsp; at 25℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91(Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30 degrees celsius with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1C).&nbsp;</p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to identify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 5 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1D). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPPs, non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). MMA91 also produced ranthipeptides which are a subset of RiPPs that kill gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine (Precord et al. 2019).  Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Some terpene-precursors have been shown to alter microbial cellular respiration and cause uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes (Huang et al. 2022). They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. This data confirms antibacterial results and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis.</i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<blockquote><p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>.</p></blockquote>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"1e61dcbc-4df1-43ba-9dd3-21978edc0ea0","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 5 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone.&nbsp;</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/0056f3acb2aef3a987230cf06377b619.jpeg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antimicrobial clearing of <i>Pseudomonas putida by</i> isolate MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. C. Phylogenetic tree depicts isolate MMA91 grouping closely with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>. D. Circos genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u>&nbsp;</p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78.712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u>&nbsp;</p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃. Plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u>&nbsp;</p><p>DNA was extracted from MMA91 after growth in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; <a href=\"https://nanopore4edu.org/\">https://nanopore4edu.org</a>). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version&nbsp; 2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics. Effective antibiotics are in a small supply. Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering&nbsp; new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens. Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours&nbsp; at 25℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91(Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30 degrees celsius with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1C).&nbsp;</p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to identify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 5 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1D). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPPs, non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). MMA91 also produced ranthipeptides which are a subset of RiPPs that kill gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine (Precord et al. 2019).  Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Some terpene-precursors have been shown to alter microbial cellular respiration and cause uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes (Huang et al. 2022). They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. This data confirms antibacterial results and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis.</i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<blockquote><p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>.</p></blockquote>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"b7f5224d-c916-4f03-a38f-f4bce92c9266","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 5 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone.&nbsp;</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/3e416c53e5eacb674b2dd767bb85f803.jpg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antimicrobial clearing of <i>Pseudomonas putida by</i> isolate MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. <i>Lysobacter&nbsp;antibioticus </i>was also plated&nbsp;as a comparison. C. Circos genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;D. Phylogenetic tree depicts isolate MMA91 grouping closely with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>. </p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u>&nbsp;</p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78.712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u>&nbsp;</p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, or <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃, plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u>&nbsp;</p><p>DNA was extracted from MMA91 after growth in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; <a href=\"https://nanopore4edu.org/\">https://nanopore4edu.org</a>). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version&nbsp; 2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics. Effective antibiotics are in a small supply. Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering&nbsp; new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens. Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours&nbsp; at 25℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91 (Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1D).&nbsp;</p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to identify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 5 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1C). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPPs, non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). MMA91 also produced ranthipeptides which are a subset of RiPPs that kill gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine (Precord et al. 2019). Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Some terpene-precursors have been shown to alter microbial cellular respiration and cause uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes (Huang et al. 2022). They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. This data confirms antibacterial results and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis.</i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<blockquote><p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>.</p></blockquote>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Angelo Kolokithas "},"openAcknowledgement":true,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"d631b3cf-0bc0-42c9-bc32-2e3294cfafd1","decision":"edit","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 5 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone.&nbsp;</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/a1770ad319b2bc081972b8391453d7d3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antimicrobial clearing of <i>Pseudomonas putida by</i> isolate MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. <i>Lysobacter&nbsp;antibioticus </i>was also plated&nbsp;as a comparison. The arrow indicates clearing by MMA91. C. Circos genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;D. Phylogenetic tree depicts isolate MMA91 grouping closely with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u>&nbsp;</p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78.712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u>&nbsp;</p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, or <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃, plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u>&nbsp;</p><p>DNA was extracted from MMA91 after growth in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; <a href=\"https://nanopore4edu.org/\">https://nanopore4edu.org</a>). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version&nbsp; 2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics (Wahnou et al., 2026). Effective antibiotics are in a small supply (Ahmed et al., 2024). Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering&nbsp;new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens (Chandra et al., 2017). Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours&nbsp; at 30℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91 (Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1D).&nbsp;</p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to identify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 5 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1C). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPPs, non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). MMA91 also produced ranthipeptides which are a subset of RiPPs that kill gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine (Precord et al. 2019). Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Some terpene-precursors have been shown to alter microbial cellular respiration and cause uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes (Huang et al. 2022). They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. </p><p>Previous work has also isolated <i>Pseudomonas </i>species with antimicrobial properties. Schlusselhuber et al. (2021) describes the isolation of a <i>Pseudomonas crudilactus </i>from raw milk that produces lipopeptides with activity against <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Salmonella enterica. </i>While lipopeptides could show activity against <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtillis (</i>de Souza Freitas et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020), Anti-smash analysis did not identity lipopeptides from <i>P. crudilactis</i> MMA91. The work presented here confirms antibacterial clearing by this soil isolate and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis.</i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Ahmed SK, Hussein S, Qurbani K, Ibrahim RH, Fareeq A, Mahmood KA, Mohamed MG. 2024. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health 2: 100081.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100081"},{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<p>Chandra N, Kumar S. 2017. Antibiotics Producing Soil Microorganisms. Soil Biology,Antibiotics and Antibiotics Resistance Genes in Soils : 1-18.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-66260-2_1"},{"reference":"<p>de Souza Freitas F, Coelho de Assis Lage T, Ayupe BAL, de Paula Siqueira T, de Barros M, Tótola MR. 2020. Bacillus subtilis TR47II as a source of bioactive lipopeptides against Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial infections. 3 Biotech 10(11): 474.</p>","pubmedId":"33072469","doi":""},{"reference":"<blockquote><p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>.</p></blockquote>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Li M, Mou H, Kong Q, Zhang T, Fu X. 2020. Bacteriostatic effect of lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis N-2 on Pseudomonas putida using soybean meal by solid-state fermentation. Marine Life Science &amp; Technology 2: 172-180.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s42995-020-00028-0"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Schlusselhuber M, Girard L, Cousin FJ, Lood C, De Mot R, Goux D, Desmasures N. 2021. Pseudomonas crudilactis sp. nov., isolated from raw milk in France. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 114(6): 719-730.</p>","pubmedId":"33715105","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"},{"reference":"<p>Wahnou H, El Kebbaj R, Demoré Ba, Limami Y, Duval RlE. 2026. Current State of the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance: What Are the Different Strategies for Tomorrow?. Antibiotics 15: 564.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics15060564"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Angelo Kolokithas "},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"59686769-1296-4c41-a837-24fcc3907f6a","decision":"edit","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 5 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone.&nbsp;</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/a1770ad319b2bc081972b8391453d7d3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antimicrobial clearing of <i>Pseudomonas putida by</i> isolate MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. <i>Lysobacter&nbsp;antibioticus </i>was also plated&nbsp;as a comparison. The arrow indicates clearing by MMA91. C. Circos genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;D. Phylogenetic tree depicts isolate MMA91 grouping closely with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u>&nbsp;</p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78.712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u>&nbsp;</p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, or <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃, plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u>&nbsp;</p><p>DNA was extracted from MMA91 after growth in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; <a href=\"https://nanopore4edu.org/\">https://nanopore4edu.org</a>). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version&nbsp; 2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics (Wahnou et al., 2026). Effective antibiotics are in a small supply (Ahmed et al., 2024). Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering&nbsp;new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens (Chandra et al., 2017). Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours&nbsp; at 30℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91 (Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1D).&nbsp;</p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to identify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 5 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1C). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPPs, non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). MMA91 also produced ranthipeptides which are a subset of RiPPs that kill gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine (Precord et al. 2019). Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Some terpene-precursors have been shown to alter microbial cellular respiration and cause uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes (Huang et al. 2022). They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. </p><p>Previous work has also isolated <i>Pseudomonas </i>species with antimicrobial properties. Schlusselhuber et al. (2021) describes the isolation of a <i>Pseudomonas crudilactus </i>from raw milk that produces lipopeptides with activity against <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Salmonella enterica. </i>While lipopeptides could show activity against <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtillis (</i>de Souza Freitas et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020), Anti-smash analysis did not identity lipopeptides from <i>P. crudilactis</i> MMA91. The work presented here confirms antibacterial clearing by this soil isolate and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis.</i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Ahmed SK, Hussein S, Qurbani K, Ibrahim RH, Fareeq A, Mahmood KA, Mohamed MG. 2024. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health 2: 100081.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100081"},{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<p>Chandra N, Kumar S. 2017. Antibiotics Producing Soil Microorganisms. Soil Biology,Antibiotics and Antibiotics Resistance Genes in Soils : 1-18.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-66260-2_1"},{"reference":"<p>de Souza Freitas F, Coelho de Assis Lage T, Ayupe BAL, de Paula Siqueira T, de Barros M, Tótola MR. 2020. Bacillus subtilis TR47II as a source of bioactive lipopeptides against Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial infections. 3 Biotech 10(11): 474.</p>","pubmedId":"33072469","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>. <b>ISBN </b>9798385144198.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Li M, Mou H, Kong Q, Zhang T, Fu X. 2020. Bacteriostatic effect of lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis N-2 on Pseudomonas putida using soybean meal by solid-state fermentation. Marine Life Science &amp; Technology 2: 172-180.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s42995-020-00028-0"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Schlusselhuber M, Girard L, Cousin FJ, Lood C, De Mot R, Goux D, Desmasures N. 2021. Pseudomonas crudilactis sp. nov., isolated from raw milk in France. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 114(6): 719-730.</p>","pubmedId":"33715105","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"},{"reference":"<p>Wahnou H, El Kebbaj R, Demoré Ba, Limami Y, Duval RlE. 2026. Current State of the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance: What Are the Different Strategies for Tomorrow?. Antibiotics 15: 564.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics15060564"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"7fa1f6ad-57f9-4fda-af18-ca5e5e3f6baf","decision":"accept","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 5 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone.&nbsp;</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/a1770ad319b2bc081972b8391453d7d3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antimicrobial clearing of <i>Pseudomonas putida by</i> isolate MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. <i>Lysobacter&nbsp;antibioticus </i>was also plated&nbsp;as a comparison. The arrow indicates clearing by MMA91. C. Circos genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;D. Phylogenetic tree depicts isolate MMA91 grouping closely with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u>&nbsp;</p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78.712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u>&nbsp;</p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, or <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃, plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u>&nbsp;</p><p>DNA was extracted from MMA91 after growth in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; https://nanopore4edu.org). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version&nbsp; 2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics (Wahnou et al., 2026). Effective antibiotics are in a small supply (Ahmed et al., 2024). Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering&nbsp;new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens (Chandra et al., 2017). Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours&nbsp; at 30℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91 (Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1D).&nbsp;</p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to identify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 5 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1C). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPPs, non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). MMA91 also produced ranthipeptides which are a subset of RiPPs that kill gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine (Precord et al. 2019). Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to Iron and starve other microbes of essential Iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Some terpene-precursors have been shown to alter microbial cellular respiration and cause uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes (Huang et al. 2022). They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins. </p><p>Previous work has also isolated <i>Pseudomonas </i>species with antimicrobial properties. Schlusselhuber et al. (2021) describes the isolation of a <i>Pseudomonas crudilactus </i>from raw milk that produces lipopeptides with activity against <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Salmonella enterica. </i>While lipopeptides could show activity against <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtillis (</i>de Souza Freitas et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020), Anti-smash analysis did not identity lipopeptides from <i>P. crudilactis</i> MMA91. The work presented here confirms antibacterial clearing by this soil isolate and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis.</i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Ahmed SK, Hussein S, Qurbani K, Ibrahim RH, Fareeq A, Mahmood KA, Mohamed MG. 2024. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health 2: 100081.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100081"},{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<p>Chandra N, Kumar S. 2017. Antibiotics Producing Soil Microorganisms. Soil Biology,Antibiotics and Antibiotics Resistance Genes in Soils : 1-18.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-66260-2_1"},{"reference":"<p>de Souza Freitas F, Coelho de Assis Lage T, Ayupe BAL, de Paula Siqueira T, de Barros M, Tótola MR. 2020. Bacillus subtilis TR47II as a source of bioactive lipopeptides against Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial infections. 3 Biotech 10(11): 474.</p>","pubmedId":"33072469","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>. <b>ISBN </b>9798385144198.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Li M, Mou H, Kong Q, Zhang T, Fu X. 2020. Bacteriostatic effect of lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis N-2 on Pseudomonas putida using soybean meal by solid-state fermentation. Marine Life Science &amp; Technology 2: 172-180.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s42995-020-00028-0"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Schlusselhuber M, Girard L, Cousin FJ, Lood C, De Mot R, Goux D, Desmasures N. 2021. Pseudomonas crudilactis sp. nov., isolated from raw milk in France. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 114(6): 719-730.</p>","pubmedId":"33715105","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"},{"reference":"<p>Wahnou H, El Kebbaj R, Demoré Ba, Limami Y, Duval RlE. 2026. Current State of the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance: What Are the Different Strategies for Tomorrow?. Antibiotics 15: 564.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics15060564"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"5ff49c5e-b8f6-4e41-8a11-bd9cda173b84","decision":"publish","abstract":"<p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from soil collected in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC, and screened for antibacterial activity. This isolate inhibited the growth of <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. After isolation and repeated antibacterial activity testing, the isolate was characterized through gram staining as a gram-negative bacillus. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced. After assembly and annotation, the genome was analyzed for secondary metabolites production to find 14 genomic regions of antibacterial activity and 5 unique mechanisms: non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS), ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs), non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone.&nbsp;</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>Safe ESKAPE strains are from Tiny Earth and Nichole Broderick at Johns Hopkins University. </p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"madison.mcmurphy@gmail.com","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"McMurphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"akclark8@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Arlo","lastName":"Clarke","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Plant and Microbial Biology"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","supervision"],"email":"hrralls@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"Ralls","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","supervision","investigation","validation"],"email":"stephanie_mathews@ncsu.edu","firstName":"Stephanie  L","lastName":"Mathews","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5909-202"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>The authors would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University for supporting this research and Tiny Earth for supporting student discovery. </p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/a1770ad319b2bc081972b8391453d7d3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"<p>A. T-streak of MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. B. Antimicrobial clearing of <i>Pseudomonas putida by</i> isolate MMA91 on LBA after 48 hours of growth at 30℃. <i>Lysobacter&nbsp;antibioticus </i>was also plated&nbsp;as a comparison. The arrow indicates clearing by MMA91. C. Circos genomic map of isolate MMA91 from genomic sequencing.&nbsp;D. Phylogenetic tree depicts isolate MMA91 grouping closely with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Characteristics of MMA91 (<i>Pseudomonas crudilactis) </i>an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from soil</p>","methods":"<p><u>Bacterial Isolation</u>&nbsp;</p><p><i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i> was isolated from a soil sample in Lake Johnson State Park in Raleigh, NC (35.76241, -78.712824) as part of a microbiology research course utilizing the Tiny Earth protocols (Hernandez et al. 2022). To isolate the bacteria, one gram of soil was diluted in a sodium buffer saline and plated on Luria Broth (LB) plates using serial dilution methods.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Screening against ESKAPE organisms</u>&nbsp;</p><p>Safe ESKAPE organisms: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>, <i>Enterobacter aerogenes</i>, <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>, <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baylyi</i>, <i>Erwinia carotovora</i>, or <i>Escherichia coli,</i> were inoculated onto LB agar (100 uL) and then a colony of MMA91 was patched onto each safe ESKAPE lawn using the spread patch method (Hernandez et al. 2022). After 24-48 hours in 30℃, with exception for <i>S. epidermidis</i> which is grown at 37℃, plates were checked for antimicrobial activity represented by clearing.&nbsp;</p><p><u>Genomic Sequencing</u>&nbsp;</p><p>DNA was extracted from MMA91 after growth in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ using the Qiagen DNAeasy UltraClean microbial kit. The genomic DNA library was performed according to the Native Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (SQK-NBD114.24) (Kolomogorov et al. 2019; https://nanopore4edu.org). The prepared library was sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION instrument using a flow cell (FLO-MIN114). The draft genome assembly was performed using BV-BRC by flye version&nbsp; 2.9.1-b1780 and polished with racon resulting in a single contig 6,700,725 bp in length (Olson et al. 2023). Genome annotation was performed by BV-BRC using RASTtk resulting in 6,039 protein encoding sequences, 67 tRNAs, and 22 rRNAs (Chauhan and Jindal 2020). Biosynthetic gene clusters were evaluated using antiSMASH 8.0 bacterial version (Blin et al. 2025).</p><p>Genbank accession number <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1466251\" id=\"e9578ba8-0922-45bc-a750-db88dbec911b\">PRJNA1466251</a>.</p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global issue; many bacterial pathogens have become resistant to antibiotics (Wahnou et al., 2026). Effective antibiotics are in a small supply (Ahmed et al., 2024). Researchers have been testing soil microbes in hopes of discovering&nbsp;new and innovative antibiotics to combat antibacterial resistance against these pathogens (Chandra et al., 2017). Soil is a diverse microbial habitat containing bacteria and other microbes that compete for limited nutrients and space. To survive in this environment, many microorganisms have the ability to produce antibiotics to inhibit the growth of neighboring organisms. These naturally occurring antibiotic-producing microorganisms have been the source of many clinically important drugs. Future antibiotic discovery may rely on these same methods but crowd-source through the work of undergraduate students across the world (Miller et al., 2025).&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>A soil sample was collected from Raleigh, North Carolina (35.76241, -78,712824), serially diluted, and plated onto LB agar. After incubation for 38 hours at 25℃, individual colonies were selected for further analysis. Soil isolates were screened for activity against safe ESKAPE pathogens utilizing the spread-patch method on LB agar and incubated for 48 hours&nbsp; at 30℃. Inhibition was observed against <i>Pseudomonas putida </i>and <i>Bacillus subtilis </i>for one isolate: MMA91 (Figure 1B). This bacterium was isolated with three successive rounds of t-streaking resulting in round, flat, white colonies with an entire margin (Figure 1A). Inhibition of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis </i>was confirmed after isolation. A Gram stain resulted in pink rods indicative of gram-negative bacteria.</p><p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen) from a liquid culture of MMA91 grown in Luria Broth for 48 hours at 30℃ with shaking at 200 rpm. The DNA was sequencing using Nanopore Native Library Kit and Nanopore MinION. This assembled genome had 1 contig, with the total length of 6,700,725 bp and an average G+C content of 59.13%. Annotation by BV-BRC identified 6,039 protein coding sequences: 1,383 hypothetical proteins and 4,656 proteins with functional assignments. Taxonomy indicates this isolate shares a clade with <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Figure 1D).&nbsp;</p><p>Using the genomic sequence, additional analysis was performed using Anti-SMASH to identify 14 secondary metabolite production regions, of which 5 were unique with known antimicrobial properties (Figure 1C). Their antimicrobial mechanisms include non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, RiPPs, non-ribosomal peptide metallophores, terpene-precursor, and beta lactone. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases have the ability to self-assemble, which allows them to adhere better to bacteria and penetrate cells more effectively (Prazdnova et al. 2026). RiPPs are pore-forming peptides that target bacterial cell envelopes (Lia Cao et al. 2021). MMA91 also produced ranthipeptides which are a subset of RiPPs that kill gram-positive bacteria by sequestration of lipid II, pore formation, and binding of phosphatidylethanolamine (Precord et al. 2019). Non-ribosomal peptide metallophores are a secondary metabolite produced by NRPS that bind to iron and starve other microbes of essential iron needed for survival (Prazdnova et al. 2026). Some terpene-precursors have been shown to alter microbial cellular respiration and cause uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the microbes (Huang et al. 2022). They have also been found to interact with the lipophilic tails of intermembrane lipids, altering the transmembrane pathways and affecting the lipid membrane activity (Huang et al. 2022). Beta Lactone is a four-membered ring molecule that inhibits bacterial growth through inactivation of essential enzymes, this includes the inhibition of ClpP protease (Lawrence P. Wackett. 2016). It mimics the action of beta-lactam antibiotics, targeting serine-dependent enzymes, such as penicillin binding proteins.</p><p>Previous work has also isolated <i>Pseudomonas </i>species with antimicrobial properties. Schlusselhuber et al. (2021) describes the isolation of a <i>Pseudomonas crudilactus </i>from raw milk that produces lipopeptides with activity against <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Salmonella enterica. </i>While lipopeptides could show activity against <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtillis (</i>de Souza Freitas et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020), Anti-smash analysis did not identity lipopeptides from <i>P. crudilactis</i> MMA91. The work presented here confirms antibacterial clearing by this soil isolate and suggests this bacterium has many mechanisms by which it can inhibit the growth of other bacteria. Future analysis is required to determine which of these secondary metabolites inhibit growth of <i>P. putida </i>and <i>B. subtilis.</i></p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Ahmed SK, Hussein S, Qurbani K, Ibrahim RH, Fareeq A, Mahmood KA, Mohamed MG. 2024. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health 2: 100081.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100081"},{"reference":"<p>Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, Augustijn HE, et al., Weber. 2025. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research 53: W32-W38.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf334"},{"reference":"<p>Cao L, Do T, Link AJ. 2021. Mechanisms of action of ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 48: 10.1093/jimb/kuab005.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuab005"},{"reference":"<p>Chandra N, Kumar S. 2017. Antibiotics Producing Soil Microorganisms. Soil Biology,Antibiotics and Antibiotics Resistance Genes in Soils : 1-18.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-66260-2_1"},{"reference":"<p>de Souza Freitas F, Coelho de Assis Lage T, Ayupe BAL, de Paula Siqueira T, de Barros M, Tótola MR. 2020. Bacillus subtilis TR47II as a source of bioactive lipopeptides against Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial infections. 3 Biotech 10(11): 474.</p>","pubmedId":"33072469","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Hernandez, S., Tsang, T., Bascom-Slack, C., Broderick, N., &amp; Handelsman, J. (2020). <i>Tiny Earth: A research guide to studentsourcing antibiotic discovery</i>. <b>ISBN </b>9798385144198.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Huang W, Wang Y, Tian W, Cui X, Tu P, Li J, Shi S, Liu X. 2022. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 11: 1380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics11101380"},{"reference":"<p>Li M, Mou H, Kong Q, Zhang T, Fu X. 2020. Bacteriostatic effect of lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis N-2 on Pseudomonas putida using soybean meal by solid-state fermentation. Marine Life Science &amp; Technology 2: 172-180.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s42995-020-00028-0"},{"reference":"<p>Miller S, Hernandez PR, Du W, Aldana CC, Lee H, Maldonado N, et al., Estrada. 2025. Tiny Earth CURE Demonstrates Equitable Benefits for U.S. College Science Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 24: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1187/cbe.23-06-0117"},{"reference":"<p>Prazdnova EV, Kulikov MP, Khmelevtsova LE. 2026. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules 31: 683.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/molecules31040683"},{"reference":"<p>Precord TW, Mahanta N, Mitchell DA. 2019. Reconstitution and Substrate Specificity of the Thioether-Forming Radical <i>S</i>-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme in Freyrasin Biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology 14: 1981-1989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acschembio.9b00457"},{"reference":"<p>Schlusselhuber M, Girard L, Cousin FJ, Lood C, De Mot R, Goux D, Desmasures N. 2021. Pseudomonas crudilactis sp. nov., isolated from raw milk in France. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 114(6): 719-730.</p>","pubmedId":"33715105","doi":""},{"reference":"<p>Wackett LP. 2016. Microbial β‐lactone natural products. Microbial Biotechnology 10: 218-220.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.12600"},{"reference":"<p>Wahnou H, El Kebbaj R, Demoré Ba, Limami Y, Duval RlE. 2026. Current State of the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance: What Are the Different Strategies for Tomorrow?. Antibiotics 15: 564.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics15060564"}],"title":"<p>Genome Sequence and Antimicrobial Production of <i>Pseudomonas crudilactis</i></p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis","label":"Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lontra longicaudis","label":"Lontra longicaudis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stewartia floidana","label":"Stewartia floridana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"941422ef-eefc-4258-bdc8-7338c63acbf2","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}},
    "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}