µP

microPublication Biology

Heino Hulsey-Vincent1ORCID logo, Makenzi McClain2ORCID logo, Morgan Buckley2ORCID logo, Jennifer R. Kowalski2ORCID logo, and Caroline L. Dahlberg1§ORCID logo

1Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, United States

2Biological Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

§Correspondence to: Caroline L. Dahlberg (dahlbec@wwu.edu)

Abstract

Description

Methods

Reagents

Extended Data

  • Description: nuIs152 and nuIs152;fshr-1(ok778) animals were imaged by both widefield (nuIs152, N = 29; nuIs152;fshr-1(ok778), N = 26), and spinning disk confocal fluorescence microscopy (nuIs152, N = 28; nuIs152;fshr-1(ok778), N = 36). One wildtype image was discarded from the Fiji dataset, since the script did not detect any puncta, likely due to the high background signal. For the widefield data, the customized Igor analysis software and the Fiji macros measured a similar increase in GFP::SNB-1 puncta intensity in the fshr-1 mutants compared to the wild type animals. We analyzed puncta intensity by normalizing to beads and found that the peak to bead increased in fshr-1 mutants (Figure 2A, K-S test, IGOR: 48% increase, p=0.00010; Fiji: 36% increase, p=0.00085). In these data, Igor detected a moderate but significant increase in puncta width in fshr-1 mutant animals compared to wild type, while Fiji did not (Figure 2B, T-test, IGOR: 16% increase, p=0.02, Fiji: p=0.21). Fiji detected a small decrease in puncta density for fshr-1 mutants, while IGOR did not (T-test,IGOR: p=0.89, Fiji: 11% decrease, p=0.026). Synapse number was still ~3/10 µm (Figure 2C). For images acquired using confocal microscopy, the average maximum punctual intensity in fshr-1 mutants was significantly higher than in wildtype (74% increase, T-test, p=3.0e-07). We did not detect a change in puncta width between the wild type and fshr-1 mutant animals (K-S test, p=0.32) or puncta density (T-test, p=0.096).. Resource Type: Image. DOI: 10.22002/h75vg-1ch76

Acknowledgements

Funding

Author Contributions

  • Heino Hulsey-Vincent: Software, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Investigation
  • Makenzi McClain: Investigation, Writing - review & editing
  • Morgan Buckley: Investigation
  • Jennifer R. Kowalski: Investigation, Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
  • Caroline L. Dahlberg: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Reviewed By

Anonymous

Database Reference ID: WBPaper00066243

History

  • Received: 9/22/2023
  • Revision Received: 10/16/2023
  • Accepted: 12/12/2023
  • Published Online: 12/14/2023
  • Indexed: 12/28/2023

References

Copyright

© 2023 by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

PubMed Central: 10755584

PubMed: 38162412

Cited By

Article in microPublication Biology, published 2023

Article in microPublication Biology, published 2023

Article in Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, published August 2024

microPublication Biology is published by

1200 E. California Blvd. MC 1-43 Pasadena, CA 91125

The microPublication project is supported by

The National Institute of Health -- Grant #: 1U01LM012672-01

microPublication Biology:ISSN: 2578-9430